CARNE ARTIFICIAL COMO ALTERNATIVA ALIMENTAR: um debate bioético necessário
Résumé
Essa pesquisa tem o objetivo de colaborar com o debate ético e bioético a respeito da viabilidade da carne artificial avaliando seus benefícios, limitações e vulnerabilidades. Para tanto, realizou-se uma revisão integrativa de textos científicos e uma análise de notícias e vídeos dos buscadores Google® notícias, Google® vídeos e Youtube®. Ambos foram categorizados pela análise de conteúdo propostas por Bardin. Nos textos científicos analisados os benefícios ao ambiente superaram os de bem-estar-animal, saúde e sociedade, enquanto as limitações sociais foram mais proeminentes do que as técnicas e éticas. No contexto popular, em ambos os veículos, os benefícios foram mais frequentes do que as limitações. Em decorrência de fundamentos éticos e ecológicos inerentes a carne artificial, acredita-se que os benefícios se pronunciam às limitações, fato que pode ser potencial gerador de vulnerabilidade caso a questão não seja tratada com cautela, principalmente na perspectiva da bioética.
Téléchargements
Références
BARDIN, Laurence. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2011.
BEKKER, Gerber A; TOBI, Hilde; FISCHER, Arnoult R. Meet meat: An explorative study on meat and cultured meat as seen by Chinese, Ethiopians and Dutch. Appetite. 1;114:82-92, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.009
BHAT, Zuhaib F; FAYAZ, Hina. Prospectus of cultured meat—advancing meat alternatives. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 48(2):125-40, 2011. doi: 10.1007%2Fs13197-010-0198-7
CHILES, Robert M. Intertwined ambiguities: Meat, in vitro meat, and the ideological construction of the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 12(6):472-482, 2013. doi:10.1002/cb.1447
DE BOER, Joop; AIKING, Harry. On the merits of plant-based proteins for global food security: Marrying macro and micro perspectives. Ecological economics. 15;70(7):1259-65, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.001
DILWORTH, Tasmin; MCGREGOR, Andrew. Moral steaks? Ethical discourses of in vitro meat in academia and Australia. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28(1):85-107, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9522-y
EVERARD, Mark; JOHNSTON, Paul; SANTILLO, David; STADDON, Chad. The role of ecosystems in mitigation and management of Covid-19 and other zoonoses. Environmental science & policy. 111:7-17, 2020. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.envsci.2020.05.017
FERNANDES, Alice Munz; TEIXEIRA, Odilene de Souza; REVILLION, Jean Phileppe Palma; de SOUZA, Angela Rozane Leal. Conceptual evolution and scientific approaches about synthetic meat. Journal of food science and technology. 57(6):1991-1999, 2020. doi:10.1007/s13197-019-04155-0
FISCHER, Marta L; CINI, Ricardo A; ZANATTA, Amanda A; NOHAMA, Norton, HASHIMOTO, Mauro S; ROCHA, Valquiria BR; ROSANELI, Caroline F. Panorama da nutrigenômica no Brasil sob a perspectiva da Bioética. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética. 20(1):27-48, 2002. Doi: 10.18359/rlbi.3475
FISCHER, Marta L; CUNHA, Thiago R, RENK, Valquiria; SGANZERLA, Anor; SANTOS, Juliana Z. Da ética ambiental à bioética ambiental: antecedentes, trajetórias e perspectivas. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos. 24(2):391-409, 2017. doi: 10.1590/s0104-597020117000200005
FISCHER, Marta Luciane; CORDEIRO, Andressa Luiza, LIBRELATO, Rafael Falvo. A abstinência voluntária do consumo de carne pode ser compreendida como um princípio ético?. Ciências Sociais Unisinos. 52(1):122-131, 2016. doi: 10.4013/csu.2016.52.1.14
FISHER, Marta L; ROSANELI, Caroline F; CUNHA, Thiago R; SGANZERLA, Anor; MOLINARI, Renata B; CINI, Ricardo A. Comunicações sobre a crise hídrica: a Internet como ferramenta de sensibilização ética. Sustentabilidade em Debate. 1;9(1):158-171, 2018. doi: 10.18472/SustDeb.v9n1.2018.25756
GOODWIN, John N; SHOULDERS, CW. The future of meat: A qualitative analysis of cultured meat media coverage. Meat Science. 95(3):445-450, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.027
HALABOWSKI, Dariusz; RZYMSKI, Piort. Taking a lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic: Preventing the future outbreaks of viral zoonoses through a multi-faceted approach. Science of The Total Environment. 757:143723, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143723
HOCQUETTE, Aurélie; LAMBERT, Carla; SINQUIN, Clementine; PETEROLFF, Laure; WAGNER, Zoe; BONNY, Sarah P; LEBERT, Andre; HOCQUETTE, Jean F. Educated consumers don't believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 1;14(2):273-84, 2015. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60886-8ff.
LAESTADIUS, Linnea I. Public perceptions of the ethics of in-vitro meat: Determining an appropriate course of action. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 28(5):991-1009, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10806-105-9573-8
LAESTADIUS, Linnea I; CALDWELL, Mark A. Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutrition. 18(13):2457-2467, 2015. doi: 10.1017/S136898001000622
LEE, Angela. Meat-ing demand: is in vitro meat a pragmatic, problematic, or paradoxical solution?. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law. 30(1):1-41, 2018. doi: 10.3138/cjwl.30.1.1
MARCU, Afrodita; GASPAR, Rui; RUTSAERT, Pieter; SEIBT, Beate; FLETCHER, David; VERBEKE, Wim; BARNETT, Julie. Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat. Public Understanding of Science. 24(5):547-562, 2015. doi: 10.1177%2F0963662514521106
MATTICK, Carolyn S. Cellular agriculture: The coming revolution in food production. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 74(1):32-35, 2018. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2017.1413059
MORITZ, Matilda S; VERBRUGGEN, Sanne E; POST, Mark J. Alternatives for large-scale production of cultured beef: a review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 1;14(2):208-216, 2015. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60889-3
POST, Mark J. Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Science. 92(3):297-301, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008
SHETH, Jagdish. Impact of Covid-19 on consumer behavior: Will the old habits return or die?. Journal of Business Research. 117:280-283, 2020. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.jbusres.2020.05.059
SLADE, Peter. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers. Appetite. 1;125:428-37, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030
SOUZA, Marcela T; SILVA, Michelle D; CARVALHO, Rachel. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein (São Paulo). 8(1):102-106, 2010.
TUOMISTO, Hanna L; MATTOS Joost. Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental science & technology. 45(14):6117-6123, 2011. doi: 10.1021/es200130u
VERBEKE, Wim; MARCU, Afrotdita RUTSAERT, Pieter; GASPAR, Rui; SEIBT, Beate; FLETCHER, Dave; BARNETT, Julie. ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat science. 1;102:49-58, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.11.013
VERBEKE, Wim; SANS, Peter; VAN LOO, Ellen J. Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 14(2):284-294, 2015. doi: 10.1016/S2095- 3119(14)60884-4ff.
WOLL, Silvia; BÖHM, Inge. In-vitro-meat: a solution for problems of meat production and con-sumption. Ernahrungs Umschau. 65(1):12-21, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ernaehrungs-umschau.de/fileadmin/Ernaehrungs-Umschau/pdfs/pdf_2018/01_18/EU01_2018_Special_invitro_englisch.pdf
YOU, Mingquing. Changes of China's regulatory regime on commercial artificial breeding of terrestrial wildlife in time of COVID-19 outbreak and impacts on the future. Biological conservation. 250:108756, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108756
