Systemic-functional analysis of violence against women in reports

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18764/2525-3441v9n25.2024.03

Keywords:

Violence against women, Report, Sociosemiotics

Abstract

 In this article, we critically and sociosemiotically analyze how semantic complexes represent violence against women in the journalistic genre of reporting. The data is qualitative-interpretative and is taken from two reports by women who had been assaulted by their ex-partners, published in a special online section of reports in Veja magazine in 2021. We draw on the contributions of Social Semiotics (Halliday; Hassan, 1989[1985]; Halliday (1985); Halliday; Matthiessen, 2014[2004]), which focuses on Systemic-Functional Linguistics, interspersed with Systemic-Functional Grammar, according to Halliday and Matthiessen (2014[2004]), with an emphasis on the Hallidayian extralinguistic level (contexts of culture and situation, highlighting the variables of register, field, relation and mode). In addition, we selected the ideational metafunction, which represents people acting in the world and on others, disclosing their experiences in the transitivity system. The conclusion we reach, based on the contexts of situation and culture, mirrored by the ideational metafunction is the persistence of patriarchal culture, which perpetuates gender inequality and violence, gender stereotypes rooted in culture, among others, highlighting the need to provide the social body with the ability to reflect and question on the subject and the importance of critical interpretation of interpersonal relationships.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Arlete Ribeiro Nepomuceno, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros

Doutorado em Estudos Linguísticos (2013) pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG. Professora adjunta efetiva na Universidade Estadual de Montes - Unimontes. Integra o corpo docente do Mestrado Profissional em Letras (PROFLETRAS)

Vera Lúcia Viana de Paes, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros

Mestra em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Bolsista Fapemig. Professora pesquisadora no projeto de extensão Unimontes/Fapemig: A Promoção do Ensino-Aprendizagem da Leitura de Textos Midiáticos Multimodais na Educação Básica (2023)

Maria Clara Gonçalves Ramos

Mestranda em Estudos Linguísticos, na linha de pesquisa Linguagem no Contexto Social, pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria/RS, bolsista pela CNPq e graduada em Letras Português, pela Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros/MG (2019-2023). 

References

FUZER, Cristina; CABRAL, Sara Regina Scotta. Introdução à gramática

sistêmico-funcional em língua portuguesa. São Paulo: Mercado de Letras, 2014.

HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; HASAN, Ruqaiya. Language, context,

and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 1989[1985].

HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; MATTHIESSEN, Christian Matthias

Ingemar Martin. An introduction to functional grammar. 3th ed. London: Hodder

Arnold, 2004.

HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood; MATTHIESSEN, Christian Matthias

Ingemar Martin. Halliday,s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London:

Routledge, 2014.

MATTHIESSEN, Christian Matthias Ingemar Martin et.al. SAL – A sistêmica

através das línguas. Projeto de pesquisa. São Paulo:PUCSP, 2010.

KRESS, Gunther; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading images: the grammar of visual

design. 3th. London: Routledge, 2021 [1996].

REVISTA VEJA on-line. Dez vítimas por dia. Edição nº 2674. Disponível em

https://veja.abril.com.br/brasil/as-vitimas-do-feminicidio-um-crime-que-cresce-aritmo-preocupante/ . Acesso em: 30 jul. de 2023.

Published

2024-07-19

How to Cite

NEPOMUCENO, Arlete Ribeiro; PAES, Vera Lúcia Viana de; RAMOS, Maria Clara Gonçalves.
Systemic-functional analysis of violence against women in reports
. Afluente: Revista de Letras e Linguística, v. 9, n. 25, p. 01–27, 19 Jul. 2024 Disponível em: https://cajapio.ufma.br/index.php/afluente/article/view/23649. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.