COMO PODEMOS ESTABELECER UM DIÁLOGO? METODOLOGIA TRANSDISCIPLINAR DO DIÁLOGO ENTRE HUMANOS, CULTURAS E ESPIRITUALIDADES

CILLIERS, Paul; NICOLESCU, Basarab. Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: Discontinuity, Levels of Reality and the Hidden Third. Futures, v. 44, n. 8, p. 711-718, 2012.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Gesammelte Werke, Hermeneutik I: Wahreit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1960.

GALILEI, Galileo. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic and Copernican. Trad. Stillman Drake; foreword by Albert Einstein. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.

HAMILTON, Clive. Requiem for a Species: why We Resist the Truth about Climate Change. London: Earthscan, 2010.

HUSSERL, Edmund. Méditations cartésiennes. Paris: Vrin, 1966.

LUPASCO, Stéphane. Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie: prolégomènes à une science de la contradiction. Paris: Hermann & Cie, 1951.

NICOLESCU, Basarab. Nous, la particule et le monde. Paris: Le Mail, 1985.

NICOLESCU, Basarab. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. Trad. Karen-Claire Voss. New York: State University of New York (SUNY) Press, 2002.

NICOLESCU, Basarab. Toward a Methodological Foundation of the Dialogue Between the Technoscientific and Spiritual Cultures. In: MOREVA, Liubava (Ed.). Differentiation and Integration of Worldviews. Sankt Petersburg: Eidos, 2004. p. 139-152.

NICOLESCU, Basarab. Transdisciplinarity as Methodological Framework for Going beyond the Science and Religion Debate. Transdisciplinarity in Science and Religion, n. 2, p. 35-60, 2007.

NICOLESCU, Basarab. From Modernity to Cosmodernity: Science, Culture, and Spirituality. New York: State University of New York (SUNY) Press, 2014.

PIAGET, Jean. L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In: APOSTEL, L. et al. (Ed.). L’interdisciplinarité: Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherche. Paris: Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement; Organisation de Coopération et de développement économique, 1972. p. 131-144.